data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e1b6/2e1b623854023963d85ef0ab7529a244289ffb1a" alt="2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv Overhead shot of blue 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv crossing a bridge" |
The 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv. |
Regular TireKicker readers know we've always loved us some Mazda 3. It's a fun, tossable little sedan (or hatch, you choose) for a reasonable price with better than average performance and fuel economy.
So what would juice the excitement factor? Well, more fuel economy would be a good place to start.
Mazda's been behind the 8-ball on that one, with a lot of people remembering that rotary engines aren't the best in that regard (never mind that the only Mazda still using a rotary is the RX-8, now in its last year of production) and Mazda being the lone ranger among the big 4 Japanese carmakers (Toyota/Lexus, Honda/Acura and Nissan/Infiniti being the others) not to have hybrids in their lineup.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7616/a76167b6c68584b4c506653c0b1e17a70aac7e74" alt="2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv Rear 3/4 view of 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv" |
Rear view of the 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv. |
Not that the 3's a gas guzzler by any means. The EPA says 22 city/29 highway for the standard Mazda 3 5-door with the 167 horsepower 2.5 liter four-cylinder and a 5-speed automatic.
But Skyactiv makes it better without making it a hybrid. According to Mazda, Skyactiv's engine produces 10-15% more low-range torque, and 15% lower fuel consumption than their previous 2-liter engine (which was EPA rated 24 city/33 highway).